<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>David Bolton Strikes Again &#187; Architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidbolton.net/blog/category/architecture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidbolton.net/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:22:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Technical Project Managers</title>
		<link>http://davidbolton.net/blog/2008/08/technical-project-managers/</link>
		<comments>http://davidbolton.net/blog/2008/08/technical-project-managers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave B</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidbolton.net/blog/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simon Brown has some excellent commentary on the idea of &#8220;Technical Project Managers&#8221;: In essence, teams get in a Technical Project Manager because they think people in this role can successfully undertake the project management *and* architecture roles on the project. Unfortunately, my experience suggests that this isn&#8217;t always the most successful approach. I&#8217;ve seen [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon Brown has some excellent commentary on the idea of &#8220;Technical Project Managers&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p>In essence, teams get in a Technical Project Manager because they think people in this role can successfully undertake the project management *and* architecture roles on the project. Unfortunately, my experience suggests that this isn&#8217;t always the most successful approach.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen this several times over the years &#8212; one can do the Project Management, or one can do Architecture, but almost without fail it seems impossible to do both at the same time on a reasonably sized project.  One role will be more emphasised than the other, at the detriment of the background role.</p>
<p>Both these roles are of such importance that crossing concerns is asking for trouble.  At a pinch, I would recommend using part time resources for each role, rather than one resource trying to cover both roles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidbolton.net/blog/2008/08/technical-project-managers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
